Skip to content
Blog

Temporal vs Cordum

A reliability-focused comparison of workflow engines for autonomous AI agents.

Jan 26, 202611 min readComparison
Temporal
  • Workflow code + replay
  • Exceptions drive retries
  • Compensation in code
Cordum
  • Protocol contract + control plane
  • Explicit FAILED_RETRYABLE / FAILED_FATAL
  • Compensation templates in JobRequest
Retries
Rollback
Checkpoints
TL;DR

Temporal and Cordum both deliver reliability, but they place responsibility in different layers. Temporal concentrates reliability in workflow code and replay, while Cordum defines reliability in the protocol and enforces it in the control plane.

  • - Temporal centers reliability inside workflow code; Cordum centers it in the control plane.
  • - Cordum exposes explicit retryable vs fatal outcomes in the protocol so orchestrators can react deterministically.
  • - Checkpoint heartbeats and compensation templates make long tasks observable and rollback safe without custom glue.
Scope

This comparison focuses on reliability primitives: retries, rollback, progress reporting, and safety gates. It is not a feature checklist of every SDK or connector.

What is being compared

Temporal is a workflow engine that emphasizes deterministic replay in code. Cordum is a control plane that enforces a protocol contract (CAP) across gateways, schedulers, and workers. Both can coordinate long running work; they differ in where reliability decisions live.

Reliability models

Dimension
Temporal
Cordum
Reliability anchor
Workflow code + deterministic replay
Protocol contract + control plane enforcement
Retry signal
Exceptions and retry policies in code
Explicit JobResult status: FAILED_RETRYABLE / FAILED_FATAL
Rollback
Compensation coded in workflow logic
Compensation template attached to JobRequest
Progress
Activity heartbeats in SDK
Checkpoint heartbeats: progress_pct + last_memo
Governance
App-level checks
Safety Kernel decisions before dispatch

Retry semantics

Temporal retries are typically configured in workflow code or activity options. Cordum surfaces explicit outcomes in the protocol: FAILED_RETRYABLE and FAILED_FATAL. That lets schedulers and orchestrators make deterministic decisions without parsing error strings.

The result is a consistent retry contract across languages and teams, even when workers are implemented in different stacks.

JobResult status signal
JobResult.status:
  JOB_STATUS_FAILED_RETRYABLE  // transient error, safe to retry
  JOB_STATUS_FAILED_FATAL      // fatal error, trigger rollback

Rollback and compensation

Temporal expects compensation to be encoded in workflow logic. Cordum uses a typed compensation template attached to the job request, so the orchestrator can dispatch inverse work without additional glue.

This is useful for small worker architectures where the worker is intentionally narrow and does not own rollback orchestration logic.

Observability and checkpoints

Temporal activities can emit heartbeats. Cordum pushes that capability down into the protocol withprogress_pct and last_memo so any worker can report checkpoints without custom tracing systems.

This makes long tasks visible to schedulers and operators, and provides a safe place to restart work after a crash.

Safety and approvals

Cordum introduces a Safety Kernel at the control plane level. Every job can be evaluated and constrained before execution. Temporal users typically implement similar checks in application code or external services.

The difference is not about capability - it is about where the enforcement lives: in code or in the control plane.

Tradeoffs and fit

  • - Temporal is strong when you want workflow logic embedded directly in code with replay semantics.
  • - Cordum is strong when you want protocol-level governance across heterogeneous workers.
  • - Cordum favors small, specialized workers with explicit contracts and centralized policy.
  • - Temporal favors SDK-centric orchestration with application-owned control flow.

When to choose which

Choose Temporal when you want a single-language workflow runtime and developer-owned orchestration logic. Choose Cordum when you need protocol-level governance, multi-language workers, and explicit control plane decisions for retries and rollback.

Explore Cordum architecture

If you are evaluating reliability models, start with the control plane and protocol primitives.

Related reading

View all